--- Ramsey <ramsey@nym.alias.net> wrote:
> From Ramsey Wed Aug 11 19:11:52 1999
> X-Apparently-To: gsquared100@yahoo.com via
> mdd501.mail.yahoo.com
> Received: from anon.lcs.mit.edu (18.26.0.254)
>   by mta108.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Aug 1999
> 19:09:51 -0700
> Date: 12 Aug 1999 02:11:52 -0000
> Message-ID:
> <19990812021152.9505.qmail@nym.alias.net>
> From: Ramsey <ramsey@nym.alias.net>
> To: gsquared100@yahoo.com
> Subject: Confidentiality: A Must
> Content-Length: 1758
> 
> Gail,
> 
> You are obviously online. Please stand by. I need to
> talk to you 
> about Collins and Patti. Is Collins saying that I
> wrote that 
> horrible ransom note? Who is he saying I am now? It
> was my 
> understanding that he was reporting that I am NOT
> Patricia 
> Ramsey. Is that still the case? Yes, he is
> dangerous. I have all 
> the mails he sent to me with his blatant use of key
> phrases from 
> the ransom note. Would you like to see those?
> 
> Yes, I have heard about the little girl's hair. Yes,
> any mother 
> with a little girl who fits a similar description of
> JonBenet is 
> in danger. However, this one man can only be in one
> place at a 
> time. You have no more to fear of him than you do of
> any other 
> child killer. I do not believe he knows that we are 
> corresponding. We are dealing with a very
> intelligent and 
> strategic personality. He is much too smart to
> randomly grab 
> children. He planned his last murder for a while
> before he 
> carried out his plans. The ransom letter mentions
> the phrase, 
> "down to the letter". This, of course, was in
> reference to his 
> expectations of our performance; however, it also
> describes his 
> own tactics.
> 
> Please have mercy on me concerning the man I have
> described. 
> Believe me, I am trying with every power in me to do
> the right 
> thing and fulfill my moral obligation. Would you not
> protect your 
> children and family at all cost? I must.
> 
> Concerning, Michael Tracey; I have considered
> talking to him once 
> more. Then, the ever-looming presence of danger sets
> in. No, he 
> is not the person who has my information. I have not
> confided in 
> him, although, he might be the ideal person to
> contact.
> 
> Who do you think you are talking to? I am not saying
> that I would 
> ever confirm my identity to you; I just want to
> know.
> 
> Sincerely
>